RevRadar cover: 15 apps for sale. Steal or trap? Beside it, the 4 cheapest by ARR multiple: Imposter AI 1.2x ARR, GenPPT 1.3x ARR, FaceKit 1.8x ARR, Marky 1.9x ARR.

The Biggest of 15 Indie Apps for Sale Makes $271.7k a Month, Grew 25%, and Still Wants Out

15 indie apps for sale on TrustMRR, ranked by ARR multiple. Figures are reported by TrustMRR on Oct 27, 2026, unless a line says otherwise. Steal or trap is my read, not buy or sell advice.


1Lookup has $271,665 in MRR. It wants $10,000,000 for the whole thing.

Steal or trap? I lined it up next to 14 other indie apps for sale on TrustMRR. Together they have $626,614 in MRR and ask $21,630,500 (my sums).

The unit: the ARR multiple, asking price ÷ ARR (MRR × 12, as reported Oct 27). Revenue, not profit. My calculation, one decimal. ARR here is just this month's MRR times 12, a run-rate, so even a months-old app has one. If you click through, TrustMRR shows its own multiple, built on the last 30 days of revenue instead of MRR, so its numbers won't always match mine.

One catch: the multiple assumes revenue holds. Nine of the 15 show revenue down over the last 30 days. If MRR follows, the sticker stays put while the multiple quietly climbs. That's the trap half of steal or trap.

Two of them broke my spreadsheet.

Boothie's founder says 9,800 paying users. TrustMRR counts 2,184 active subscriptions. Same listing, a 4.5x gap. I'll come back to it at #8. Spoiler: I still can't close it, but I can tell you the question to ask.

The other is the $10M app. The listing doesn't say why it's for sale, and someone asked the founder in public. Hold that thought until #11.

One number I don't have: churn. It isn't on the public pages I read, so churn is UNKNOWN for all 15. Remember that whenever a number looks too good.

The curve, last 30 days: 5 up, 9 down, 1 flat. Nine for-sale signs hanging off nine down arrows.

Here's that curve, app by app. Revenue over the last 30 days vs the 30 before, reported by TrustMRR. 1Lookup is the one running the other way at +25%. Draftly is the one that fell off the chart at −50%.

Revenue change over the last 30 days (%). 9 down, 5 up, 1 flat. Reported by TrustMRR.

Eight lines per app. UNKNOWN means no source says. Search estimates have their own section.

Ranked by ARR multiple, cheapest first. Sleek and Werewolf tie at 2.2x, Draftly and MagicSlides.app at 5.7x.

15 indie apps for sale, ranked by ARR multiple. Asking price ÷ ARR (MRR × 12). Revenue, not profit. Cheapest first.

1. Imposter AI: 1.2x ARR

Top line: $20,100 MRR, asking $300,000 (1.2x ARR, on 10 months of revenue; TrustMRR founded date Dec 2025), −27%. Selling "to have capital to move on to next project". On X too: https://x.com/tomiarakaki/status/2068235717680263438

The cheapest ARR multiple on the list, sold to fund the next project.

2. GenPPT: 1.3x ARR

Top line: $7,804 MRR, asking $125,000 (1.3x ARR), −5%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

"100% organic" may describe today. Per the post, Google Ads went to $0 and UGC was $2.5K. Now the curve has to prove the revenue didn't notice.

3. FaceKit: 1.8x ARR

Top line: $22,683 MRR, asking $500,000 (1.8x ARR, about 10 months since its App Store launch), −4%. Why selling: UNKNOWN; the founder's sale post gives none.

A looksmaxxing app with a for-sale sign and 0 Google visits a month (Ahrefs estimate, Oct 26; it's a store-first app, so web traffic isn't representative). Somebody's mirror is doing the marketing.

4. Marky: 1.9x ARR

Top line: $22,132 MRR, asking $495,000 (1.9x ARR), −27%. Why selling: UNKNOWN. @micro_buyer, an outside account: "36 offers, still unsold after 5 months".

Two names, two audiences, two revenue figures, 36 offers. The ask and the offers have been staring at each other for five months.

5= Sleek: 2.2x ARR

Top line: $19,110 MRR, asking $500,000 (2.2x ARR), −19%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

Revenue down 19%, search traffic on the dashboard, and not a word from the founder on what pays. You'd be buying the app and the mystery of which visitors actually subscribe.

5= Werewolf: Undercover: 2.2x ARR

Top line: $8,280 MRR, asking $220,000 (2.2x ARR), −6%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

The app narrates the game. Nobody narrates where the players come from.

7. Conductor: 2.3x ARR

Top line: $44,613 MRR, asking $1,250,000 (2.3x ARR), +14%. Why selling: UNKNOWN. His X bio: "building space factories, YC P26". Context, not a reason.

The seller message says it "Completely runs itself". The founder's bio says space factories. Somebody still has to mind the QuickBooks.

8. Boothie: 2.4x ARR

Top line: $51,786 MRR, asking $1,500,000 (2.4x ARR, about 4 months since its App Store launch), +14%. Why selling: UNKNOWN. The founder's only public line on it: "Dm for offers."

Back to the gap: 9,800 paying users against 2,184 active subscriptions. It's unresolved. My read: a credit-pack buyer has paid without being an active subscription, so the numbers may count different things. The question a buyer should ask: how many of the 9,800 paid once, and how many pay every week? That decides whether $51,786 in MRR is a subscription business or a very good launch.

You'd be buying an app and adopting a small cast of characters.

9. Laper: 2.5x ARR

Top line: $48,305 MRR, asking $1,470,500 (2.5x ARR), +11%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

The founder names two channels: paid traffic and influencers. A buyer gets to find out which one is doing the heavy lifting.

10. Vid.AI: 2.7x ARR

Top line: $46,992 MRR, asking $1,500,000 (2.7x ARR), −5%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

TrustMRR's earliest point is $98,968 in Oct 2024. Sep 2026 is $41,590, falling at every step. If the ads were already off, that's the organic floor. If not, you're buying either the floor or the trapdoor under it.

11. 1Lookup: 3.1x ARR

Top line: $271,665 MRR, asking $10,000,000 (3.1x ARR), +25%. Why selling: UNKNOWN, the loop from the top. @chrisdrit asked the founder on X, "Why are you selling 1Lookup?" I found no reply.

The replies to my last post went straight for it:

https://x.com/0xbono/status/2114753065400307951

https://x.com/TheMantalBoy/status/2114784467084603556

It's 3.1x ARR (my calculation). TrustMRR's own multiple, read Oct 26, says 1.8x. Different formula, different day. By ARR multiple it's 5th priciest: ten of the 15 ask less.

The twist: last 30 days brought $452,284, 66% above MRR, cause UNKNOWN. Auto-replenish top-ups could do it. My guess, not the page's.

To @TheMantalBoy's question about organic dying off: its Google visits went up over the year, mostly on free-tool pages (Ahrefs estimate, Oct 26).

Ten million dollars, and the two answers I'd want first, why sell and what churns, are both UNKNOWN.

12. AbMaxx: 4.1x ARR

Top line: $20,170 MRR, asking $1,000,000 (4.1x ARR, about 9 months since its App Store launch), −22%. Selling because: "I'm just stretched thin with a bunch of other projects and don't have the time for this."

The caveat: whatsthe.app showed "Asking price: $350,000" on Oct 26. On that ask it's 1.4x ARR (my calculation).

One app, two price tags. The negotiation started before anyone said hello.

13. StoryShort: 5.0x ARR

Top line: $20,013 MRR, asking $1,200,000 (5.0x ARR), +6%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

The founder calls it his best Google week since July. TrustMRR shows revenue up 6% over 30 days. For once the founder's mood and the number agree.

14= Draftly: 5.7x ARR

Top line: $12,751 MRR, asking $870,000 (5.7x ARR, on 8 months of revenue; first TrustMRR revenue month Feb 2026), −50%. Why selling: UNKNOWN.

Its monthly chart runs from $149 to that $29,924 high. That's a chart shaped like a heart monitor.

14= MagicSlides.app: 5.7x ARR

Top line: $10,210 MRR, asking $700,000 (5.7x ARR), flat (shown as −0%). Why selling: UNKNOWN. The message says "I'm open to offers".

Tied with Draftly for the highest multiple in the pile. A slides add-on is asking a bigger multiple than the $10M API. At least the price tag is consistent.

Where the visitors come from (estimates)

Where each app's website visitors came from, Jul to Sep 2026. Similarweb estimate, 11 apps with enough web data. My favourite slice: for 1Lookup, 76% of referral visits came from trustmrr.com. The for-sale sign is a marketing channel.

Where each app's visitors come from (estimated % of visits). Search, direct, paid, social, referral. One bar per app.

FaceKit sells through the App Store and Conductor gets few website visits, so read their bars with a pinch of salt.

Then I opened the code. This grid shows which ad tags and affiliate programs I found on each app's website. A tag on the site means the tag is installed, not that ads are running. Store-first apps can buy installs without any tag on their website, so "not found" there proves nothing.

The loudest column: 9 of the 15 have an affiliate program on their website, and two have no website to check. GenPPT offers affiliates up to 50% for life, plus $200 per review. Somebody really wants to be reviewed.

Ad tags and affiliate programs found on each app's website. What's installed, not what's spent.

Search estimates (Ahrefs, read Oct 26, 2026)

Google search visits a month, all figures Ahrefs estimate, Oct 26. Not TrustMRR figures or founders' analytics.

Now over time: Google search visits per month since Nov 2025, for five of the apps. Google search only, Ahrefs estimate, not total traffic. Sleek and Laper zigzag their way up. StoryShort zigzags down. MagicSlides gets its own chart below, because next to it everyone else is a flat line: 113,258 Google visits in Nov 2025, down to 23,368 by June 2026, then back up to 47,314 in October. That's Ahrefs' month-by-month history; its live snapshot, used in the table below and the MagicSlides section, says ~41,927. Same tool, two counts.

Estimated monthly Google search visits. One line per app. Up is good, down is a conversation with the buyer.
MagicSlides' Google visits fell 79%, then more than doubled. Estimated monthly Google search visits, Nov 2025 to Oct 2026. Ahrefs estimate.
AppVisits a monthNote
MagicSlides.app~41,927paid search ~3.3k in Oct 2025, about zero since
Sleek~10,741
Vid.AI~4,293mostly brand searches
1Lookup~2,34244 in Oct 2025
Laper~2,281growing
GenPPT~2,044paid search 1,861 and 983 in May and Jun 2026
StoryShort~1,279down from 3,274
Marky~530
Draftly~161
Conductor~151
AbMaxx0web traffic not representative (store-first app)
Boothie0web traffic not representative (store-first app)
FaceKit0web traffic not representative (store-first app)
Imposter AI, Werewolf: UndercovernoneApp-store only: no web domain, so no web traffic figures.

Boothie scores 0 here and still says 9,800 paying users. Store-first apps don't wait for Google's invitation.

Churn: the number I don't have

No public page I read shows churn. The closest is Conductor's "Virtually no churn", with no figure.

@lingships put it better than I can:

https://x.com/lingships/status/2114737419694350396

MRR tells you how big the bucket is. Churn tells you how big the hole is. This issue only measured the bucket, so bring a towel.

About the numbers


The listing is the pitch. That grid of ad tags is the receipts so far. How they actually got their customers gets its own piece.

Want the next one in your inbox? Subscribe free at revradar.fyi

I'm thinking about paid deep-dives. Thinking, not promising. Vote with one click: revradar.fyi/deep-dives

— @AndriusMacikas

Revenue case studies of AI apps, straight to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

How we handle your email

or follow along on X

Follow RevRadar on X